Articles

How the All Blacks dismantled the Wallaby lineout in Sydney Posted about 1 month ago

Default

Photo: Getty Images

How the All Blacks dismantled the Wallaby lineout in Sydney

It’s a funny thing, momentum. One week, you’re playing for the Crusaders and winning the Super Rugby final against the Lions. Two weeks later, you’re an All Black and achieving a resounding success against Australia in the first round of The Rugby Championship in Sydney.

That was the case for red-and-black lineout forwards Sam Whitelock, Kieran Read and Scott Barrett, and they took something concrete with them from the success against Lions into the match at Stadium Australia.

As I wrote in my last article, the Crusaders’ victory was squarely based on winning the battle of lineout defence on the ground. In Sydney, they won the lineout battle in the air instead. The focus on lineout defence was alive and well in both games and there was a distinct carryover from the provincial tournament to the international competition.

One of the most stimulating training sessions on The Rugby Site is Victor Matfield’s superbly lucid series on the lineout. Matfield captained what is generally acknowledged to be the most dominant lineout in rugby history for the Springboks in the first decade of the new millennium.

South Africa always had five targets in the back five forwards, with Matfield and his second row partner Bakkies Botha supported by tall, athletic back-row forwards like Juan Smith, Danie Rossouw, Schalk Burger and Pierre Spies behind them.

The current New Zealand team is reaching towards that exalted level with its current lineout core group of number 8 Read, Whitelock and his second row cohort Brodie Retallick.

Matfield’s series helps illuminate the problems the Wallabies experienced in the first round. Victor begins his introduction by emphasizing the ultimate value of speed off the ground and into the air, of beating your opponent to the punch:

“Action always beats reaction. You have to have your footwork ready. If you want to beat a guy, beat him on the ground.”

The failure of the Wallabies’ receivers was firstly a failure of footwork on the ground. Victor Matfield spends a large portion of time in the early part of his session on converting the footwork of his schoolboy charges from ‘two steps’ to ‘one step’. He suggests that taking out that extra step into your jump can buy you an invaluable extra fraction of a second to get into the air before your opponent:

View the first clip now

View the second clip now

In the first example, the All Black defender opposite the intended receiver (Izack Rodda) is Brodie Retallick. He has turned to face Rodda and is looking for cues from Rodda’s body language about the timing of the jump.

The reason he is able to match Rodda’s rhythm and time his counter precisely is due to the fact that Rodda takes two steps to leave the ground rather than one. He is slow into the air and gains no advantage over Retallick off the ground.

The second example comes from the camera angle behind the posts. Retallick is again the main contestant, this time opposite the Wallaby open-side flanker Michael Hooper. With Hooper giving away over 20 centimetres in height to Retallick, it is essential that he beats Retallick on the ground in order to win the ball in the air.

The use of two steps towards the ball rather than one is even more obvious in this instance. It gives Retallick all the time he needs to get up and makes the most of his physical advantages in the contest.

Victor Matfield also comments on the importance of picking the right throw depending on how your opponent has set up:

Watch the clip

Here Retallick is clearly set up looking down the line, and straight at the Wallaby hooker Tatafu Polota-Nau. He will therefore be reading the hooker’s ‘twitch’ first, not the movement of the receiver (Rodda again). This is the right moment for a change of position by either the receiver and/or his lifters before the ball is ever delivered, but that does not occur.

Polota-Nau throws the ball in, Retallick reacts and gets off the ground first – and for all the world it looks like an All Black throw rather than an Australian one!

One of the points Matfield emphasizes towards the end of his training session is the importance of making dummy or decoy motion convincing. If this motion does not attract a defender away from the intended target area, it is more than likely that the throw will be turned over again:

Watch it now

In this instance it is Rodda’s task to pull up the line and persuade Retallick that the real action is going to happen at the tail. In practice, big Brodie simply ignores Rodda’s movement and picks up Adam Coleman as he enters his zone of influence. Again the reaction is quicker than the action and the All Blacks beat their opponents on the ground to steal the ball in the air.

Summary
The Australian lineout disintegrated at Stadium Australia, losing seven out its 11 throws in from touch. If Victor Matfield was given the task of reviewing the Wallaby lineout performance on Saturday evening, he would not be a happy man!

Australia broke almost all of Victor’s cardinal rules for effective lineout performance. They took too many steps to get into the air and this allowed the All Black poachers to match rhythm with them; they did not pay enough attention to the set-up of the New Zealand contestants, and their dummy ploys were not effective in distracting them away from the real target area.

It was just about as complete a failure of a modern professional lineout as it’s possible to imagine, but credit is also due to the techniques and ability of the All Blacks who caused the breakdowns to occur. They took the momentum built from the Crusaders’ defensive lineout performance against the Lions and built it into a steamroller on the international stage.

The Rugby site is the only online coaching resource to offer a truly global perspective, subscribe for 12 months – now at a lower price point.

Enter your email address to continue reading

We frequently post interesting articles and comment from our world class content providers so please provide us with your email address and we will notify you when new articles are available.

We'll also get in touch with various news and updates that we think will interest you. We promise to not spam, sell, or otherwise abuse your address (you can unsubscribe at any time).

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

Nick has worked as a rugby analyst and advisor to Graham Henry (1999-2002), Mike Ruddock (2004-2006) and latterly Stuart Lancaster (2011-2015). He also worked on the 2001 British & Irish Lions tour to Australia and produced his first rugby book with Graham Henry at the end of the tour. Since then, three more rugby books have followed, all of which of have either been nominated for, or won national sports book awards. The latest is a biography of Phil Larder, the first top Rugby League coach to successfully transfer over to Union. It is entitled “The Iron Curtain”. Nick has also written or contributed to four other books on literature and psychology. "He is currently writing articles for The Roar and The Rugby Site, and working as a strategy consultant to Stuart Lancaster and the Leinster coaching staff for their European matches."

Comments
Topic Set Piece
Applicable to Coaches   Players   Others   Supporters and fans  

Related articles

The where and when of ‘how to offload’

The offload can be one of the most exciting and rewarding skills in the game of Rugby Union. Analyst Nick Bishop explains how offloading is a particularly valuable skill for teams who know that they will not go into most games with an advantage in physical size and power over their opponents.

What is Creativity? – the curious case of Beauden Barrett versus South Africa

If the notion of creativity can be summarized in one word, that word would be ‘vision’. Better peripheral awareness and depth perception lead to better decision-making, and from this perspective Beauden Barrett’s game in the recent match between New Zealand and South Africa in Wellington was of interest from start to finish. Analyst Nick Bishop reflects on Barrett’s performance in his latest article.

How the Crusaders lineout defence stood up to be counted in Christchurch

Lineout defence is one of the most important single aspects of defence as a whole. Analyst Nick Bishop explains how the Crusaders defused the vaunted Lions Lineout and primary attacking weapon in last weekend’s Super rugby final.

The importance of ‘reloading’ and understanding space

How do you find the spaces which Townsend claims are always there, at times when the defence is still likely to be cohesive and well-organized? Analyst Nick Bishop illustrates how important accurate ‘reloading’ from a stopping point can exploit ‘re-positionings’ mismatches and create space on the field.

How to make good choices after the break

What happens in the time and space after a break has been made is just as important, if not more so, than the initial breach. In his latest article, analyst Nick Bishop looks at the effect of right and wrong options after line breaks during the recent Crusaders vs Highlanders super rugby match.