Why Rugby is creeping into the grey area at ruck and maul Posted about 2 years ago

Photo: The Rugby Site

Why Rugby is creeping into the grey area at ruck and maul

Professional coaches spend an awful lot of time looking for loopholes, or grey areas within the rugby lawbook which they feel they can exploit. These are in modern times quite extensive, and there is plenty of scope for interpretation (by referees) and experimentation (by coaches and players)!

Nowhere is that mix of interpretation and experimentation more intensive than at ruck and maul. Italy famously achieved a huge, yet lawful ‘cheat’ at the ruck in their 2017 Six Nations game against England by pulling defenders out of the ruck as it formed, or ensuring they were not bound on to any other player on the ground.

Under the laws as they stood at the time, it meant that a ruck had not formed and therefore there was no offside line for the defence to respect. The Azzurri were able to creep up on to England’s side of the ball throughout the match and stymie all their attempts at attack with ball in hand. The law was changed soon afterwards to prevent a repeat scenario!

A few months later, I wrote an article on The Rugby Site illustrating another lawful ‘cheat’ in maul defence, based on a European Champions Cup match between Benetton Treviso and Leinster.

Throughout the game Treviso had a defender on the edge of a maul use his bind to swing around on to the ball-carrier at the back of the drive, or the scrum-half trying to clear the ball, and block clearance. Look at the actions of the Treviso number 7 in this instance from the original article:

View the clip

As I pointed out at the time, this represents a ‘smart-assault’ on Laws 16.4 and 16.5 governing offside at the maul:

“16.4. Each team has an offside line that runs parallel to the goal line through the maul participants’ hindmost foot that is nearest to that team’s goal line. If that foot is on or behind the goal line, the offside line for that team is the goal line.

“16.5. A player must either join a maul from an onside position or retire behind their offside line immediately.”

Because the defender joins from an onside position and never releases his initial bind, his actions are legal – but they hardly look fair and natural, and there is no high-value application of skill involved.

Since then, this method has become a major plank in defence of the lineout drive at the elite level of the professional game. Witness these examples from recent end-of-year tour game between Scotland and Australia:

View the clip

The Scotland fringe defender (loose-head prop Pierre Schoeman) starts with a left-arm bind on his immediate opponent, then uses it to creep around on to the Australian side – to the point where his sitting right next to the ball-carrier, and the ball has to be moved away.

Some of the examples looked every bit as ridiculous as the events at the ruck in the England-Italy game:

View the clip

The big Wallaby second row Will Skelton has an opponent directly in front of him, but he also has another (in the red hat) attached firmly to his coat-tails as the maul struggles to advance!

Now, it appears that virus has spread to rucks where a box kick exit off number 9 can be expected. In the recent Gallagher Premiership game between Saracens and Sale, the home side had clearly developed a new idea to test the limits of the offside law and the refereeing of ‘creepage’.

A typical set-up for the box kick exit would look like this:

The kicking team builds a ‘caterpillar’ of blockers to give the kicker protection, while the first edge defender (Saracens number 4 Maro Itoje) strives to rush from an onside position behind the hindmost foot to block the kick down.

On three occasions during the game, Saracens experimented with a more liberal interpretation of the bind in order to get the blocker closer to the halfback:

View the clip

It is a rough translation of the same defensive technique utilized at the maul. The potential blocker (Nick Isiekwe) uses his bind on the defender at the back of the ruck to swing around on to the kick. While all the Sale players are pointing North-South directly upfield, the two Saracens forwards are looking East-West and shaping towards the far side-line.

Here is the same method viewed from another angle towards the end of the game:

View the clip

Itoje attaches himself to the back man and then tries to use the bind to swing himself around into the path of the kick.

The offside laws governing ruck and maul would clearly benefit from another thorough overhaul by World Rugby. The question of how a defensive bind affects the notion of offside is very much alive and well, despite the adjustment made after the England v. Italy match back in 2017. The bind can be used by a smart defensive side to position themselves far closer to the ball at both ruck and maul than should be possible – at least if the spirit, rather than just the letter of the law is to be the criterion of judgement.

The Rugby site is the only online coaching resource to offer a truly global perspective. Subscribe today and get inside the game.

Enter your email address to continue reading

We frequently post interesting articles and comment from our world class content providers so please provide us with your email address and we will notify you when new articles are available.

We'll also get in touch with various news and updates that we think will interest you. We promise to not spam, sell, or otherwise abuse your address (you can unsubscribe at any time).

See all Breakdown videos


comments powered by Disqus

Nick has worked as a rugby analyst and advisor to Graham Henry (1999-2002), Mike Ruddock (2004-2006) and latterly Stuart Lancaster (2011-2015). He also worked on the 2001 British & Irish Lions tour to Australia and produced his first rugby book with Graham Henry at the end of the tour. Since then, three more rugby books have followed, all of which of have either been nominated for, or won national sports book awards. The latest is a biography of Phil Larder, the first top Rugby League coach to successfully transfer over to Union. It is entitled “The Iron Curtain”. Nick has also written or contributed to four other books on literature and psychology. "He is currently writing articles for The Roar and The Rugby Site, and working as a strategy consultant to Stuart Lancaster and the Leinster coaching staff for their European matches."

Topic Breakdown
Applicable to Coaches   Players   Others   Supporters and fans   Managers   Referees   Youths, ands, highs, and schools   Modules and onlies   Sevens  

Related articles

Why Super Rugby Pacific was right to drop ‘Dupont’s Law’ from SRP 2024

Super Rugby Pacific have dumped World Rugby’s “Dupont’s Law” for their 2024 competition. As Nick Bishop details using the recent Scotland v France 6N’s match they have good reason to.

Why the driving lineout is here to stay as a prime attacking platform

The driving lineout is fast becoming the most creative source of offensive thinking in the professional game. Using the recent Ireland vs France 6N game for some seminal illustrations, Nick Bishop explains how the attacking potential has come about.

How to attack wide – the Toulouse way!

The best attacking teams in the current era never take the apparent space they are offered on the edge without checking, or switching inside first.

Why defences need to adjust quickly to early-phase strikes

Whatever the pattern of defence, every player needs to be on the same page in terms of their attitudes and adjustments. Or as Nick Bishop, using the recent Leicester vs Saracens Premiership, highlights teams can get repeatedly ‘stung’ from the same play.

How to create early attacking options from the “21”

If your charges can learn to run one play exceptionally well, you will force opponents to adjust to it – and that will create opportunities elsewhere.
As Nick Bishop evidences in Racing 92’s match against fellow Top 14 side Toulon.