How to blind-side your opponent from scrums! Posted 23 days ago


Photo: The Rugby Site

How to blind-side your opponent from scrums!

Defence in the modern game is built around the speed at which the defensive line can move up and mount pressure on its opponents. Both Sir Graham Henry’s and Rodney So’oialo’s modules on The Rugby Site illustrate the importance of igniting, and then sustaining momentum on defence. The idea is to take the initiative away from the attack.

So the question for the offence becomes “How can we offset that momentum? How can we take away some of that speed?”

One of the most effective fundamental solutions is the use of the blind, or short-side – or the creation of attacking platforms in the middle of the field. The reason that this recipe works is that a defence is very rarely able to mount effective line-speed on both sides of either a set-piece or a breakdown, so it tends to focus on generating pressure on one side only.

Typically, they will choose the wider side of the field to mount the rush. The more passes that are made across the width of the field, the more opportunity there is to rush up on one of the outside receivers and take man and ball together, or break in between the passer and his target to make an interception.

The blind-side is often protected by slower or less dynamic defenders and the attitude is more passive. If the planning and execution is accurate, this gives the attack the opportunity to create chances without worrying about the potential disruption created by line-speed.

Likewise, if there is a set-piece or ruck in a central position, the initiative is generally in the hands of the offence, because the D cannot be certain where the main attacking effort will fall. This fact dilutes defensive line-speed quite naturally.

One of the best situations in which to exploit a scarcity of line-speed is from scrum, where there are fewer players manning the ramparts, and each with larger line-splits to defend. The All Blacks are masters at flooding a one side of the field, and ‘misdirecting’ the D to exploit the blind-side in these scenarios.

Let’s take a look at a couple of examples. Ever since he became New Zealand’s number one choice at first five-eighth after the 2015 World Cup and the retirement of Dan Carter, the New Zealand coaches have tried to find ways of utilizing Beauden Barrett’s speed and power when opponents have to defend against him in space.

One of the very best high line-speed defences the All Blacks have had to face in recent times is the system coached by Andy Farrell, for both Ireland and the British & Irish Lions in 2017.

In the game against Ireland in November 2016, New Zealand successfully identified a situation in which the Irish defence would be unable to mount a rush, at a scrum in midfield:

The All Blacks have split their backs to both sides, with the majority of four (Barrett, centres Malakai Fekitoa and Anton Lienert-Brown and wing Julian Savea) all to the left, and the speedy Ben Smith and Israel Dagg over on the right.

The adjustment this formation causes to the defence is obvious in the shot from behind the posts as Barrett receives the ball on the left:

Three defenders have stay to mark Smith and Dagg and the possibility of an 8-9 move on the All Black right. This in turn means that Ireland will not be able to develop any line-speed on the other side, because the Kiwi first receiver (Barrett) will be the responsibility of Conor Murray, the Irish half-back.

The rest of the Ireland backs on that side have to adopt angles which enable Murray to close the distance on to Barrett, so that the structure becomes a passive holding operation, looking out towards the touch-line.

In the event, Murray cannot not get out to Barrett in time to make the tackle, with the target moving away from him at speed:

Watch it here

Australian coach Nathan Grey has meanwhile been busy building a high line-speed defence with the Wallabies. In the third Bledisloe match of the 2018 season at Yokohama, New Zealand showed how to neutralize that line-speed by misdirecting the defence, and returning ‘blind’ at a scrum on the left side of the field:

View the clip

Again Barrett is the focal point of the play, but this time as a passer and support player rather than a runner. New Zealand know that the Wallabies will want to rush on the large open-side portion of the field, and they first encourage that line-speed to develop by making two passes (from Kieran Read to T.J. Perenara, and from Perenara to Barrett) out in that direction.

With the Australian back-row following the ball open-side as well, at the key moment the ball is switched back in the opposite direction. The two defenders on the blind-side (Wallaby number 9 Will Genia “1” and number 13 Israel Folau “2”) are passive, and like their counterparts in the Ireland game looking out towards the side-line:

The passivity allows New Zealand left wing Rieko Ioane to build enough momentum to drive through Genia and offload to Barrett in the challenge of Folau.

We live in the era of defences that want to build as much line-speed as possible – to deliver frontal tackles and create disruption and turnovers through hard physical contact.

The responsibility is now on the attack to create situations in which they can expect much more passive responses by their opponents. Scenarios in midfield (where the defence cannot mount a rush to both sides) or with a blind- or short-side provide those situations.

A lot of these prime attacking possibilities can occur from scrums, where there are fewer defenders trying to guard bigger spaces. Overloading one side with attackers, or using misdirection to trick the defence into driving up on the wrong side of the attack are great methods to overcome an aggressive rush. Grabbing and maintaining the initiative is everything, whatever part of the field you occupy!

The Rugby site is the only online coaching resource to offer a truly global perspective, subscribe for 12 months – now at a lower price point.

Enter your email address to continue reading

We frequently post interesting articles and comment from our world class content providers so please provide us with your email address and we will notify you when new articles are available.

We'll also get in touch with various news and updates that we think will interest you. We promise to not spam, sell, or otherwise abuse your address (you can unsubscribe at any time).


comments powered by Disqus

Nick has worked as a rugby analyst and advisor to Graham Henry (1999-2002), Mike Ruddock (2004-2006) and latterly Stuart Lancaster (2011-2015). He also worked on the 2001 British & Irish Lions tour to Australia and produced his first rugby book with Graham Henry at the end of the tour. Since then, three more rugby books have followed, all of which of have either been nominated for, or won national sports book awards. The latest is a biography of Phil Larder, the first top Rugby League coach to successfully transfer over to Union. It is entitled “The Iron Curtain”. Nick has also written or contributed to four other books on literature and psychology. "He is currently writing articles for The Roar and The Rugby Site, and working as a strategy consultant to Stuart Lancaster and the Leinster coaching staff for their European matches."

Topic Attack
Applicable to Coaches   Players   Others   Supporters and fans  

Related articles

How to attack with the box-kick

The perception of ‘negative play’ in rugby is often associated with kicking the ball. The idea that a team which can no longer think of anything positive to do with the ball, kicks it away instead. Analyst Nick Bishop looks at how kicking is now about creating opportunity for the offence, rather than simply to move the ball off the field of play.

The where and when of ‘how to offload’

The offload can be one of the most exciting and rewarding skills in the game of Rugby Union. Analyst Nick Bishop explains how offloading is a particularly valuable skill for teams who know that they will not go into most games with an advantage in physical size and power over their opponents.

What is Creativity? – the curious case of Beauden Barrett versus South Africa

If the notion of creativity can be summarized in one word, that word would be ‘vision’. Better peripheral awareness and depth perception lead to better decision-making, and from this perspective Beauden Barrett’s game in the recent match between New Zealand and South Africa in Wellington was of interest from start to finish. Analyst Nick Bishop reflects on Barrett’s performance in his latest article.

How the All Blacks dismantled the Wallaby lineout in Sydney

In his latest article analyst Nick Bishop uses Victor Matfield’s excellent Lineout series to helps illuminate the problems the Wallabies experienced in the first All Black test last week.

How the Crusaders lineout defence stood up to be counted in Christchurch

Lineout defence is one of the most important single aspects of defence as a whole. Analyst Nick Bishop explains how the Crusaders defused the vaunted Lions Lineout and primary attacking weapon in last weekend’s Super rugby final.