‘Bending the line’ with the blind-side wing & two lines of attack Posted about 4 years ago

Photo: The Rugby Site

‘Bending the line’ with the blind-side wing & two lines of attack

In his last article for The Rugby Site, Dave Ellis focused on the idea of ‘bending the line’ by means of a ‘front door, back door option’ and especially via the use of the blind-side winger, who is more often than not the key extra attacker in the modern game.

Dave’s introductory comments are worth repeating:

“Teams that really rush up hard on defence cannot afford a slight disconnect in their line integrity and creative attacking sides are looking at doing just that by having ‘front door’ and ‘back door’ options but more importantly very active blindside wingers. Running lines and timing are key to success in these plays, all players must be a genuine threat and players from depth look more effective when hitting onto the ball late. Second touch rugby allows the attack to get greater numbers around the ball which help create these options.”

He uses further examples from games of the Northampton Saints to demonstrate his meaning. The Saints are coached by ex-Hurricanes’ boss Chris Boyd, with one of the liveliest young intellects in the English game (ex-Leicester full-back Sam Vesty) handling the attack structures.

During the recent group stages of the European Champions Cup, Leinster found that Northampton’s attack patterns from set-piece were the most difficult to neutralize.

The main reason for the problems arising was the presence of one of the biggest and most powerful ball-carriers in the world game on Northampton’s left wing – the Australian ‘Tank’, 6’5 inches and 130 kilos of Taqele Naiyaravoro.

I say ‘left wing’, but in the Saints attacking system, the problems are effectively doubled by their tendency to shift the Tank to the blind-side wing on both sides of the field, right and left. They are then multiplied the Saints’ ability to run circle balls or wrap-around plays in midfield, the equivalent of ‘second touches’ for the defence, or an extra man for the attack.

The front door/back door options, and the use of the blind-side wing, are most clearly illustrated from set-piece attack. One of the earliest examples occurred at a 6th minute lineout from the first match in a ‘double-header’ between the two teams:

View it here

The lineout occurs on the left side of the field, with Naiyaravoro as the blind-side wing:

At first glance the Leinster defence looks to be in good shape. It has managed to push out its number 7 Josh van der Flier (in the red hat on the ground) onto Saints’ number 10 Dan Biggar and take him out of the game. Get your defending 7 on to the attacking 10, and you will normally enjoy extra insurance against attacks wide out. Your own number 10 is still in play defensively and can move on to next receiver.

A deeper examination reveals persistent problems for the defence. There are still two potential flat receivers – “1” (centre Matt Proctor) and “2” (full-back Ahsee Toala) – with Naiyaravoro lurking at “3” on a wider arc behind them. The distributor (number 12 Rory Hutchinson) is passing off square, and this creates an issue for the key Leinster defender – number 13 Garry Ringrose in the highlighted box.

Ringrose has been forced to stop and look in towards Hutchinson, and he now has to make a decision about how best to defend the space out to his wing James Lowe. If Northampton time the move perfectly, that means a two-on-one for the Leinster outside centre, because he has to account for both Toala and Naiyaravoro.

In the event, he stays tight and that allows Hutchinson to pass flat across the defence and put Toala into a hole. To quote Dave Ellis, “at one stage any lateral runner was mainly used to get the ball to a more direct runner. However now we are seeing a lateral runner often pass to another on a similar line”.

View it here

There is a ricochet effect on the following phase too. After the Toala tackle-bust, Ringrose has only just gets himself back into line in time to be targeted by the next wave ball-carrier, number 8 Teimana Harrison. He has only been able to regroup straight back within range of the previous ruck into another ‘danger zone’. Northampton scored wide out on their left on the very next play.

A few minutes later, Saints engineered another break from 1st phase lineout:

View it here

There is a neat circle ball between first receiver Hutchinson and Biggar, and suddenly a very familiar defensive issue has been created for Garry Ringrose:

Hutchinson has used the momentum from his flat positioning to propel himself into Johnny Sexton and take him out of play, which leaves Ringrose facing the same choice between staying tight for the flat runner (“2” Proctor) or shifting out to cover Naiyaravoro’s wide arc from the second line of attack (“3”). This time he picks ‘the Tank’ and that allows Proctor to take the gap inside him.

As Dave Ellis points out, ‘bending the line’ and the concept of two lines of attack has grown from being a simple back door option, to a decision-tree with multiple variations. It puts the question to a key defender and asks him to find the right answer. If the passer and his receiving options can keep their discipline and focus, the odds probably fall out in their favour.

The Rugby site is the only online coaching resource to offer a truly global perspective, subscribe for 12 months – now at a lower price point.

Enter your email address to continue reading

We frequently post interesting articles and comment from our world class content providers so please provide us with your email address and we will notify you when new articles are available.

We'll also get in touch with various news and updates that we think will interest you. We promise to not spam, sell, or otherwise abuse your address (you can unsubscribe at any time).

See all Attack videos


comments powered by Disqus

Nick has worked as a rugby analyst and advisor to Graham Henry (1999-2002), Mike Ruddock (2004-2006) and latterly Stuart Lancaster (2011-2015). He also worked on the 2001 British & Irish Lions tour to Australia and produced his first rugby book with Graham Henry at the end of the tour. Since then, three more rugby books have followed, all of which of have either been nominated for, or won national sports book awards. The latest is a biography of Phil Larder, the first top Rugby League coach to successfully transfer over to Union. It is entitled “The Iron Curtain”. Nick has also written or contributed to four other books on literature and psychology. "He is currently writing articles for The Roar and The Rugby Site, and working as a strategy consultant to Stuart Lancaster and the Leinster coaching staff for their European matches."

Topic Attack
Applicable to Coaches   Players   Others   Supporters and fans  

Related articles

How to cover the attacking breakdown

The premium on excellent skills at the breakdown is becoming more important, especially for a club with a positive ball-in-hand mindset.
As Nick Bishop illustrates using the resurgent Queensland Reds as an example.

How England upset Ireland’s Grand Slam plans at Twickenham

Nick Bishop details the key ingredient that led to England’s upset 6N win over 6 to 1 favourite and Grand Slam-elect Ireland.

Why Super Rugby Pacific was right to drop ‘Dupont’s Law’ from SRP 2024

Super Rugby Pacific have dumped World Rugby’s “Dupont’s Law” for their 2024 competition. As Nick Bishop details using the recent Scotland v France 6N’s match they have good reason to.

Why the driving lineout is here to stay as a prime attacking platform

The driving lineout is fast becoming the most creative source of offensive thinking in the professional game. Using the recent Ireland vs France 6N game for some seminal illustrations, Nick Bishop explains how the attacking potential has come about.

How to attack wide – the Toulouse way!

The best attacking teams in the current era never take the apparent space they are offered on the edge without checking, or switching inside first.