What attention to detail at the cleanout really means Posted about 5 years ago

Photo: The Rugby Site

What attention to detail at the cleanout really means

Ireland coach Joe Schmidt is famous for his attention to detail. Then he excels at the relating the detail to the big picture.

Maybe it is because of his previous career as Assistant Principal of a large, 1,400 pupil school in New Zealand – Tauranga Boys School – but Schmidt insists on the right relationship between on and off-field behaviour. In this respect he is just like Sir Graham Henry, the former head of Kelstons Boys High School and perhaps the greatest of all New Zealand coaches.

Schmidt likes to quote the Greek philosopher Aristotle: “We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence is not an act, but a habit.” Not just as words, but as a litmus test of the behaviour of his rugby players.

When a player dropped his room keys in the corridor of a hotel in which the Ireland team was staying and left them there, it was a topic highlighted by Schmidt at the next team meeting:

“That sort of stuff won’t be tolerated. If we are sloppy off the pitch, we will be sloppy on it.”

Schmidt looked at the incident as a micro-example of disrespect – disrespect to the jersey the player represented, and disrespect to the hotel staff who had to clean up after him.

The All Blacks call this attitude “sweeping the sheds” – the will to finish what you’ve started, to take responsibility for every action and leave nothing to chance. Perhaps this is what marks Joe Schmidt out as the natural successor to Graham Henry and Steve Hansen, when Hansen eventually leaves the top job in New Zealand rugby.

As his outside-half with Ireland and current World Player of the Year Johnny Sexton commented:

“Joe is our point of reference for all things to do with attack and there are no grey areas. If there’s the tiniest detail out of place on an attacking move, he’ll pull us up on it: ‘Why are you here when you’re supposed to be there? You should know that. Do it again until we have it spot on.’”

Nowhere is this attention to detail more evident than in the work of Schmidt’s Ireland team at the attacking breakdown. In the November series of four matches, Ireland built more rucks than anyone else (575), with the highest rate of ball retention (98.6%). If you cannot get the ball off a team, it becomes a very hard task to beat them.

At the core of Ireland’s breakdown stats is a mix of excellent judgement and individual technique. They very rarely waste players at a ruck where they are not needed, and they find ways to remove threats even the odds do not appear to be in their favour.

Their success can be measured by the number of ‘wins’ in one-versus-one cleanout attempts, and in backs-versus-forwards contests. Let’s look at some examples of Irish breakdown work from the titanic contest against the All Blacks in Dublin.

View it here

After the Ireland number Josh van der Flier (in the red hat) breaks the first tackle, he becomes temporarily isolated from his support. His first support (full-back Rob Kearney) loses his footing on the right of the tackle and the ball is exposed to the poach by the All Blacks open-side flanker Ardie Savea.

It is the task of Ireland number 8 C.J. Stander to remove Savea one-on-one. Stander is not approaching from the optimal angle but his technique is very accurate.

The ball on the floor can only be stolen is the defender gets his hands on it, so the primary target for a successful cleanout is the arms. Stander anchors his grip underneath Savea’s shoulders and performs an ‘arm scissors’, pulling the defender’s arms in together and jack-knifing him off the ball with force:

Ireland win quick ball and the play carries on.

There is nothing accidental about Ireland’s technique. At another example later in the same half, the home side were in danger of losing control of the ball at an advancing scrum:

Watch the example here

On this occasion roles are reversed, with Stander carrying the ball and van der Flier as the main support player. New Zealand number 12 Ryan Crotty has a shot at the turnover, but van der Flier scissors the arms and pulls him sharply off the ball to the right:

The final example illustrates how a couple of backs can use superior technique to clean out an individually stronger opponent:

View the final example here

When Bundee Aki is brought to earth, All Black second row Brodie Retallick – a huge man and an excellent breakdown operator – is standing above him. As he locks on to the tackle ball, it is the job of two Ireland backs (number 13 Garry Ringrose and number 10 Johnny Sexton) to remove the threat to possession.

Again, the Ireland players target the arms – Ringrose the right, Sexton the left – while Sexton also uses his right arm to destabilize Retallick by taking his base away – his left or standing leg:

Neither Ringrose nor Sexton would be anywhere near strong enough to take Retallick off the ball with power, but the accuracy of their technique allows them to be effective.


Ireland’s Joe Schmidt already coaches with the same values as his All Black counterparts, Sir Graham Henry and Steve Hansen. He insists on high standards of behaviour both on and off the field, on the need to ‘sweep the sheds’ and take responsibility for every individual action. I believe this makes him a New Zealand head coach-in-waiting.

Nowhere is Schmidt’s insistence on individuals taking responsibility, and paying attention to the detail of their work, more evident than at the cleanout.

In order to maintain the Irish policy of ball control, players are expected to perform one-on-one cleanouts, and backs are expected to be able to remove forwards.

It is the excellence of their individual technique, not their overwhelming power, which allows them to do it successfully. They become what they do, through the quality of their repeated habits.

The Rugby site is the only online coaching resource to offer a truly global perspective, subscribe for 12 months – now at a lower price point.

Enter your email address to continue reading

We frequently post interesting articles and comment from our world class content providers so please provide us with your email address and we will notify you when new articles are available.

We'll also get in touch with various news and updates that we think will interest you. We promise to not spam, sell, or otherwise abuse your address (you can unsubscribe at any time).

See all Coaches Corner videos


comments powered by Disqus

Nick has worked as a rugby analyst and advisor to Graham Henry (1999-2002), Mike Ruddock (2004-2006) and latterly Stuart Lancaster (2011-2015). He also worked on the 2001 British & Irish Lions tour to Australia and produced his first rugby book with Graham Henry at the end of the tour. Since then, three more rugby books have followed, all of which of have either been nominated for, or won national sports book awards. The latest is a biography of Phil Larder, the first top Rugby League coach to successfully transfer over to Union. It is entitled “The Iron Curtain”. Nick has also written or contributed to four other books on literature and psychology. "He is currently writing articles for The Roar and The Rugby Site, and working as a strategy consultant to Stuart Lancaster and the Leinster coaching staff for their European matches."

Topic Coaches Corner
Applicable to Coaches   Players   Others   Supporters and fans  

Related articles

Why the driving lineout is here to stay as a prime attacking platform

The driving lineout is fast becoming the most creative source of offensive thinking in the professional game. Using the recent Ireland vs France 6N game for some seminal illustrations, Nick Bishop explains how the attacking potential has come about.

How to attack wide – the Toulouse way!

The best attacking teams in the current era never take the apparent space they are offered on the edge without checking, or switching inside first.

Why defences need to adjust quickly to early-phase strikes

Whatever the pattern of defence, every player needs to be on the same page in terms of their attitudes and adjustments. Or as Nick Bishop, using the recent Leicester vs Saracens Premiership, highlights teams can get repeatedly ‘stung’ from the same play.

How to create early attacking options from the “21”

If your charges can learn to run one play exceptionally well, you will force opponents to adjust to it – and that will create opportunities elsewhere.
As Nick Bishop evidences in Racing 92’s match against fellow Top 14 side Toulon.

How to run a two-phase switchback attack with options

Nick Bishop looks at how leading teams are creating multiple threats early in the phase-count, and sustaining those threats for longer on attack than the defence can successfully manage them.