Articles

Psychology and the small moments of performance Posted over 1 year ago

Default

Photo: The Rugby Site

Psychology and the small moments of performance

Most successful rugby teams at professional level are those who emphasize ‘doing the next job’ and passing beyond failures, small or large, as quickly as possible. Players who cannot move swiftly beyond their mistakes are invariably found out at the elite level of any sport and tend to be targeted by the opposition.

The New Zealand All Blacks have had Gilbert Enoka doing their psychological work for them throughout their long period of recent success. Wayne Smith was one of the first to benefit from Enoka’s guidance as a player, and it was the beginning of a long association between the two men:

“I got into a routine that involved some visualisation… Everyone daydreams – but this is more a structured way of seeing yourself perform and making the right decisions while you’re sitting in your chair. It complements a lot of the physical stuff you do.”

After the 2007 disaster in a quarter-final against France, Enoka initiated a way of thinking which could minimize the tendency to hit the panic-button (what Enoka now calls ‘red head’ reactiveness) and instil clarity of thought under pressure (‘blue head’).

Brad Thorn would throw water over his face, and Richie McCaw would stamp his feet into the turf in a literal and metaphorical ‘grounding’ back in the moment that was actually happening, rather than those which had already passed, or those they imagined happening some time in the game’s future.

The need for external motivation was still seen as a weakness in the macho ethos of amateur rugby, so it took a long time for Enoka to be accepted as a ‘mental skills’ coach and his work to be properly valued. Now his longevity has outdistanced every All Black coach and player – he has been involved for 14 years and 167 Test matches.

More mature professional sports than rugby have much more of a background in integrating mental skills training. The celebrated American Basketball coach Phil Jackson, who has won eleven NBA championships with the LA Lakers and Chicago Bulls, relies on George Mumford as his ‘mindfulness expert’.

Mumford was the first to introduce meditation practices into real training time for the Lakers. As Jackson says,

“George is there to build the muscle of the mind…He tries to get your basketball life, your whole life, in a peaceful, relaxed state so that you can compete… He tries to teach the players a way to relax and regain focus within a couple of breaths.”

Mumford’s task with the Bulls was to upgrade the concentration of the other players around Michael Jordan, a player who accessed “the zone” – that sporting sacred ground where everything is fully in focus and unfolding in the moment in rhythm with the player’s mind and body – on a regular basis. He succeeded.

As one of Jordan’s team-mates, Bill Wennington put it,

“[Playing] with Michael, you have to be in the moment. You can’t worry about what just happened, the basket you missed, the foul you made two minutes ago, because it’s over. You can’t worry about what’s gonna happen the next time down the floor.”

Likewise, Mumford introduced specific mental training techniques to the Lakers’ preparation which helped them rehearse pressure situations before they ever happened. As all-time Laker great Kobe Bryant recalls,

“It increased our performance a lot… I’m surprised other teams don’t do that kind of stuff. Working with George helped us to get issues out of the way before they even started.”

The work of specialists like Enoka and Mumford will always be been pilloried by those who do not understand the small margins involved in elite sport – and there will be a natural resistance within the establishment to information from ‘outside the box’. Nonetheless, that information is rapidly becoming the most precious commodity available.

The experience of small margins became a very concrete reality for me while watching the Clermont-Leinster European Champions Cup semi-final play out in Lyon last weekend.

During our (Leinster’s) preparation for the match, we had proposed the use of an attacking move with which Joe Schmidt had enjoyed success as coach of Leinster a few years ago, and against the same opponents.

Cometh the day, and a moment in the game occurred where all the planning could be brought to bear in a moment on the field. The move involves the half-back running away from the base of the breakdown and then wrapping around a forward first receiver. If the defence is successfully drawn out of the guard position, there will be space for a runner hidden behind the ruck to run into.

Watch it here

One of the crucial elements in the success of the play is the ability of the attacking cleanout players to prevent defenders in or around the ruck from filling the potential running lane.

In this instance, the Leinster #7 Dan Leavy hangs on to the ankle of Aurelien Rougerie at the back of the ruck – an action that occurs at almost every breakdown in the modern game. Leavy’s action is clearer from the camera angle from behind the posts:

View it now

Rightly or wrongly, the try was disallowed, and the entire complexion of the game changed as a result. If the try had stood, Leinster would have won the game.

The small margins in this example also have an historical background. When I was working with Stuart Lancaster in the England coaching group, we encountered exactly the same attacking set-up in our 2014 Six Nations game against Ireland:

View the clip

It is the same move, with the Irish #9 Conor Murray dragging the defence away from guard and full-back Rob Kearney appearing from a hidden position behind the ruck. The difference is that in this instance, the block by Paul O’Connell on Joe Launchbury as he moves across the face of the ruck to make the tackle, goes unpunished:

Watch it here

Is Leavy’s hold on Rougerie more significant than O’Connell’s block on Launchbury? It is a very finely-balanced question – and one that illustrates the minute detail, and judgment of that detail upon which the fate of elite professional rugby matches can now depend.

An important part of that detail is the psychological preparation for all the potential situations that are likely to arise during games. Remember the story of Gilbert Enoka, who steadily became one of the most influential figures in All Black success over the last decade – he was first listed as a ‘masseur’ because of the innate resistance within the establishment to his real role in the coaching group. It is a salutary thought.

The Rugby site is the only online coaching resource to offer a truly global perspective, subscribe for 12 months – now at a lower price point.

Enter your email address to continue reading

We frequently post interesting articles and comment from our world class content providers so please provide us with your email address and we will notify you when new articles are available.

We'll also get in touch with various news and updates that we think will interest you. We promise to not spam, sell, or otherwise abuse your address (you can unsubscribe at any time).

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

Nick has worked as a rugby analyst and advisor to Graham Henry (1999-2002), Mike Ruddock (2004-2006) and latterly Stuart Lancaster (2011-2015). He also worked on the 2001 British & Irish Lions tour to Australia and produced his first rugby book with Graham Henry at the end of the tour. Since then, three more rugby books have followed, all of which of have either been nominated for, or won national sports book awards. The latest is a biography of Phil Larder, the first top Rugby League coach to successfully transfer over to Union. It is entitled “The Iron Curtain”. Nick has also written or contributed to four other books on literature and psychology. "He is currently writing articles for The Roar and The Rugby Site, and working as a strategy consultant to Stuart Lancaster and the Leinster coaching staff for their European matches."

Comments
Topic Mindset
Applicable to Coaches   Players   Others   Supporters and fans  

Related articles

How to attack with the box-kick

The perception of ‘negative play’ in rugby is often associated with kicking the ball. The idea that a team which can no longer think of anything positive to do with the ball, kicks it away instead. Analyst Nick Bishop looks at how kicking is now about creating opportunity for the offence, rather than simply to move the ball off the field of play.

How to blind-side your opponent from scrums!

Defence in the modern game is built around the speed at which the defensive line can move up and mount pressure on its opponents. Analyst Nick Bishop looks at when the offence becomes “How can we offset that momentum? How can we take away some of that speed?”.

The where and when of ‘how to offload’

The offload can be one of the most exciting and rewarding skills in the game of Rugby Union. Analyst Nick Bishop explains how offloading is a particularly valuable skill for teams who know that they will not go into most games with an advantage in physical size and power over their opponents.

What is Creativity? – the curious case of Beauden Barrett versus South Africa

If the notion of creativity can be summarized in one word, that word would be ‘vision’. Better peripheral awareness and depth perception lead to better decision-making, and from this perspective Beauden Barrett’s game in the recent match between New Zealand and South Africa in Wellington was of interest from start to finish. Analyst Nick Bishop reflects on Barrett’s performance in his latest article.

How the All Blacks dismantled the Wallaby lineout in Sydney

In his latest article analyst Nick Bishop uses Victor Matfield’s excellent Lineout series to helps illuminate the problems the Wallabies experienced in the first All Black test last week.