Does ‘retrospective refereeing’ do the game any good? Posted about 6 years ago

Photo: talkSPORT

Does ‘retrospective refereeing’ do the game any good?

You should never underestimate the power and influence of the Six Nations.

It is without doubt the sport’s most valuable asset outside of the Rugby World Cup in terms of the audience it attracts, the promotional potential it provides and its power to engage fans old and new.

England’s narrow 12-6 victory over Wales attracted an impressive UK TV audience of 6.4m to underline the appeal of what is billed as ‘rugby’s greatest championship’.

That kind of popularity makes it imperative that the sport capitalises on the opportunity but unfortunately that was not the case at Twickenham where the officials and not the players stole the headlines.

The decision to rule out a try for Wales’ Gareth Anscombe when replays suggested he had won a race with England’s Anthony Watson to touch the ball down in-goal sparked a row that continues to rumble on either side of the Severn Bridge.

The ruling will have confused the most ardent of fans and, crucially, will have also left casual observers scratching their heads and re-thinking any plans to take their relationship with the sport to the next level.

At least one camera angle appeared to confirm the try but it did not offer enough evidence of a score for Television Match Official Glenn Newman who informed referee Jerome Garces of his decision and who in turn denied the Welsh what would have been a crucial try in what turned out to be a low-scoring encounter.

Perhaps fearing the fall out and subsequent impact on the image of the game, and their handling of it, World Rugby would later admit to Wales that an error had been made by the officiating team. Although not unprecedented, it was a headline-grabbing move that does not sit well with all.

It was not a public confession like the statement issued following the controversial finale to Australia’s 2015 Rugby World Cup quarter-final victory over Scotland. On that occasion, referee Craig Joubert was singled out for incorrectly awarding a penalty to Australia that allowed Bernard Foley to kick the Wallabies to a last-gasp 35-34 victory.

This time, World Rugby referees’ boss Alain Rolland spoke to Wales coach Warren Gatland privately as part of the ‘continual dialogue’ between coaches and officials during any international window.

However, news of the apology was shared with the media by Wales assistant coach Rob Howley and you sense that information will have only seen the light of day with World Rugby’s blessing.

It was similar to the ‘private’ apology that was reportedly issued by Rolland to All Blacks coach Steve Hansen after scrum-half Aaron Smith was yellow-carded during his side’s victory over Ireland in Dublin back in 2016.

England head coach Eddie Jones is certainly not a fan of what he called ‘retrospective refereeing’ and firmly believes that the full time whistle should signal not just the end of the game but also finger-pointing at referees.

“I just think that once the game’s done and dusted that’s the game,” he told reporters ahead of his side’s Championship against Scotland in Edinburgh.

“You can’t have retrospective refereeing of decisions being done. The game’s done and dusted, so we’ve got to trust the referees and respect their integrity.”

“When I say respect the referee, that’s the TV process as well. You leave it at that, and then you get on with it. One side’s won, one side’s lost.”

It will be interesting to see if Jones takes a similar stance if his side are denied a try in a game of equal importance or even maybe a World Cup Final that could not only jeopardise a result but his job prospects.

But his points worthy of debate – are you doing more damage than good by revisiting and revising such decisions? What does World Rugby hope to gain?

Elite officials are of course subjected to the same kind of performance analysis as leading players but just as a leading coach would not publically castigate a player for a costly mistake, World Ruby should not shame their referees, assistants and Television Match Officials in such a way.

Closer analysis of England’s win, and most other games, would probably provide evidence of many infringements that either went unpunished or were incorrectly given – should World Rugby offer an apology for every such error?

Of course not, which makes the decision to publicly place a black mark against Newman’s name, and by association that of Garces, all the more concerning and not just for those individuals.

You would hope for more support from your employer and it is a policy that will do little to boost the recruitment of officials at all levels of the game.

Some believe the blame lies with ref Garces as ‘the sole judge of fact and of law during a match’ and suggested he should have queried the TMO’s decision.

But that ignores the fact that it was by no means clear cut and that he may have agreed with the view that there was no ‘grounding’ of the ball having seen it for himself on the big screen.

Perhaps the issue is with the wording of the Law rather than the performance of the officials in question?

The recently simplified Law 21.1b states that:

View it here

“The ball can be grounded in in-goal:"

a) By holding it and touching the ground with it; or

b) By pressing down on it with a hand or hands, arm or arms, or the front of the player’s body from waist to neck.

You can judge for yourself as to whether Anscombe’s actions meet this definition. It is certainly up for debate.

Interestingly, there is no mention of ‘control’ and perhaps such a requirement would remove doubt in such a scenario as this when it is just fingers flailing for just the merest of contact on the ball.

The great thing is that the Six Nations is only just warming up and we have three rounds of matches to elevate this year’s Championship beyond this mishap.

The Rugby site is the only online coaching resource to offer a truly global perspective, subscribe for 12 months – now at a lower price point.

Enter your email address to continue reading

We frequently post interesting articles and comment from our world class content providers so please provide us with your email address and we will notify you when new articles are available.

We'll also get in touch with various news and updates that we think will interest you. We promise to not spam, sell, or otherwise abuse your address (you can unsubscribe at any time).

See all News & Opinions videos


comments powered by Disqus

Graham Jenkins is a freelance sports journalist who has been reporting around the rugby globe for over 20 years. A former editor of the leading rugby union website, he is a veteran of five World Cups and cites England’s 2003 triumph as the most memorable moment of his professional career - closely followed by a night out with Toulon owner Mourad Boudjellal.

Topic News & Opinions
Applicable to Coaches   Players   Others   Supporters and fans  

Related articles

Can Japan shock the world again?

Countries have finalised their RWC squads and now finalise their preparations for the tournament. Writer Graham Jenkins in his latest article looks at Japan’s prospects as host nation and make another indelible mark on sporting history.

Coaching to inspire in your own orbit

As the world celebrated the 50th anniversary of the Apollo Moon landing, writer Graham Jenkins reflects on how coaches should be looking to inspire, and positively influence, their players within their own orbit.

Innovate or die? Rugby's continued quest to stay relevant.

The pressure on English rugby, and the game in general, to adapt and ensure the long-term success of the sport is evident in two innovations that are set to debut next season. Writer Graham Jenkins looks at these innovations and their possible positive effect on the game and its continued evolution.

Coaches should embrace ‘half game rule’ challenge

From the start of next season, all match day squad players at every level of youth, junior and minis rugby, from ages 6 to 18, must play at least half a game. A policy that has been in place in NZ and Wales for some years. Graham backgrounds the rationale behind the move and the impact on coaches.

Is it time the Six Nations packed down behind the Nations Championship concept?

World Rugby’s plan for a ground-breaking annual Nations Championship uniting both hemispheres appeared to have little support when revealed last month but is it actually a concept we should all be embracing? Writer Graham Jenkins looks at the merits of the plan.