Could Six Nations benefit from injection of fresh blood? Posted about 2 years ago


Photo: World Choice Sports

Could Six Nations benefit from injection of fresh blood?

It was always going to prove difficult for the Six Nations to match the recent Rugby World Cup in terms of thrills and spills and so it has proved – so far at least.

The first two rounds of the northern hemisphere’s premier championship have yet to set the rugby world alight or match the standard set by the sport’s showpiece event that captivated the rugby globe just a few short months ago.

Fatigue will surely have played its part with Europe’s finest players offered little chance for recuperation before being drawn back into the domestic battle. Changes within coaching and playing staff may also have contributed to the Championship’s failure to emerge from the World Cup’s shadow.

While the shifting of the Six Nations in the year after the sport’s World Cup to a date later in the calendar may be favoured by some, perhaps the long-term solution and key to a more entertaining Championship was offered by the sport’s showpiece event?

Georgia more than held their at the World Cup where they scored two notable victories against the higher-ranked and much-fancied Tonga and also Namibia. There were also brave but eventually fruitless defeats to titans New Zealand and Argentina.

But this was no overnight success as they’ve long been leading the charge for a place at the Six Nations’ table having dominated Europe’s second tier over the last decade.

Los Lelos captured their fifth straight European Nations Cup title last year – and eighth since the turn of the century – and are on course for another with two victories this year having cemented their position at the top of what is sometimes called the ‘Six Nations B’ table.

The Georgians’ headline-grabbing fourth consecutive World Cup appearance – their best ever performance – not only secured them many new fans but also automatic qualification for the 2019 Rugby World Cup in Japan – thanks to their third place finish in Pool C.

They appear more than ready to step up and their introduction could offer a thrilling new element of jeopardy to what is already a dramatic annual battle for Six Nations glory – as well as offer fresh impetus for the media and fans alike.

Tbilisi may not strike you as a rugby hotbed but there is huge interest in the sport in the country and they have attracted more than 50,000 fans to the National Stadium in recent years for crucial clashes.

It may not be as attractive to supporters as a weekend in Rome, for example, and its location on the edge of Europe bordering Asia may cause some other logistical issues but they should not be used as barrier to entry.

And the addition of a new country does not necessarily have to come at the expense of one of the existing competitors with the introduction of promotion/relegation between the Six Nations and European Nations Cup favoured by many.

The side clearly under most threat by that kind of proposal is Italy. The Azzurri exploded onto the scene with a stunning victory over Scotland in their first ever Six Nations appearance back in 2000 but they have struggled to maintain such high standards ever since with only the occasional upset to offer evidence that they belong among the elite.

They have collected the ‘Wooden Spoon’ a total of ten times since joining the Championship and have never finished better than 4th place which they have done on just two occasions – in 2007 and again six years later. But casting out one nation in favour of another may not benefit the game as a whole in the long run.

Octavian Morariu, president of Rugby Europe, the body responsible for the governance of international rugby in Europe outside of the Six Nations, is one of those calling for an expansion to seven or maybe eight teams to aid development.

World Rugby is intent on growing the game in developing and existing markets but sadly they have little influence over the Six Nations that is owned and run by the competing unions themselves.

Those same unions benefit greatly from the success of the competition with the Championship generating millions through broadcasting rights agreements and a variety of sponsorship deals.

Understandably the six unions currently bankrolled by that significant revenue are reluctant to welcome a new partner and accept a smaller share of the financial windfall on offer.

If you were in any doubt, Six Nations chief executive John Feehan made it quite clear on the eve of this year’s Championship by insisting it was not his job to ‘provide solutions’ for upwardly mobile countries like Georgia

The Six Nations is a business – and a fruitful one at that – and would only contemplate Georgia’s introduction if they offered a compelling financial argument when it came to possible TV and advertising revenue. Unfortunately Georgia does not possess that kind of commercial clout.

Even the imminent changes to the voting rights on the World Rugby Council that will grant developing nations more of a say on the future of the game will not prompt a change of heart on the part of the Six Nations.

But instead of focusing on what they can’t provide maybe ponder what they do bring to the table?

The northern hemisphere failed to provide a semi-finalist at the recent World Cup where the Six Nations repeatedly failed to topple one of their major southern hemisphere rivals.

Fears remain over the standard of rugby produced by Europe’s best and the threat of relegation from a currently comfy Six Nations set-up could inject the urgency required to fuel the necessary improvement.

With the door to the Six Nations firmly closed, if not locked, Rugby Europe’s best hope is to raise the profile of their own competition and nurture the sport’s following outside of the continent’s major markets to the point they become an attractive proposition.

The broadcasting of European Nations Cup Division 1A matches via the recently launched is a huge step in the right direction and sure to increase exposure, drive revenues and fuel the development of the professional game – but it will of course take time.

That is not good news for Georgia who are craving top-flight opposition to build on their recent success but could find themselves with even less competitive fixtures.

With their place at the 2019 World Cup already assured the European Nations Cup takes on less significance and they are forced to rely on the generosity of their Tier 1 neighbours for meaningful fixtures.

The failure to provide Tier 2 nations with regular games against the sport’s giants outside of Rugby World Cups is another of the major barrier to the development of the game.

Georgia have been handed the chance to test themselves against the best on a handful of occasions – most recently against Ireland in 2014 – and Scotland will oblige this year. Romania, currently second in the European Nations Cup Division 1A table, have not played a Tier 1 team outside of a World Cup since 2006.

If a permanent place among the elite is not an option then Europe’s leading sides need to play their part in the development of the game and offer them regular opportunities to test themselves against the best.

The Rugby site is the only online coaching resource to offer a truly global perspective, subscribe for 12 months – now at a lower price point.

Enter your email address to continue reading

We frequently post interesting articles and comment from our world class content providers so please provide us with your email address and we will notify you when new articles are available.

We'll also get in touch with various news and updates that we think will interest you. We promise to not spam, sell, or otherwise abuse your address (you can unsubscribe at any time).


comments powered by Disqus

Graham Jenkins is a freelance sports journalist who has been reporting around the rugby globe for over 20 years. A former editor of the leading rugby union website, he is a veteran of five World Cups and cites England’s 2003 triumph as the most memorable moment of his professional career - closely followed by a night out with Toulon owner Mourad Boudjellal.

Topic News & Opinions
Applicable to Coaches   Players   Others   Supporters and fans  

Related articles

Does ‘retrospective refereeing’ do the game any good?

England’s narrow 12-6 victory over Wales attracted an impressive UK TV audience of 6.4m to underline the appeal of what is billed as ‘rugby’s greatest championship’. Writer Graham Jenkins examines how rugby failed to capitalise on its popularity at Twickenham where the officials and not the players stole the headlines.

Continuity the key to continued success for England

In a sporting landscape where the news of a coach losing their job often appears as common as a kick off, word of one being rewarded with a contract extension certainly commands attention. In his latest article, Graham Jenkins evaluates Eddie Jones’ England head coach contract extension and what the succession plan could be.

The benefit of coaching out of your comfort zone

Ronan O’Gara is set to swap French Top 14 side Racing 92 for the Crusaders in New Zealand next month in a bold bid to improve as a coach and broaden his understanding of the game. Writer Graham Jenkins looks at O’Gara’s motivation for heading down under to the Crusaders.

Money talks in World Cup bid process

In the wake of their success, even France acknowledged that the current financial model and the selection criteria make it almost impossible for any nation outside the deep-pocketed French and English to take on the role of tournament hosts. Writer Graham Jenkins explores the reality of the ‘voting’ and the future tournament prospects.

Is the congested calendar slowly killing the game?

Graham Jenkins considers ongoing debate about the physical and mental demands of what is quite clearly an over-congested season.