Bridging the Gap - The Breakdown - HS and A with Chris Pollock
Ex international referee Chris Pollock in this new series explains what referees are looking for during a game bridging and the gap between coaches and refs.. This series is all about the breakdown.
Part 1. Chris Pollock - Introduction 2:22 Free video
TRS introduces Chris Pollock, ex international referee. In this video we hear from Chris as he explains how he can help coaches and players understand the game better. Enjoy!
Part 4. Contesting for the ball after the Tackle #2 3:47 Member content
In this video, we look at decisions after the tackle and in particular the gain line. Enjoy!Play video
Part 5. Contesting for the ball after the Tackle #3 3:47 Member content
The ruck has formed, who can do what to secure possession? Watch and learn!Play video
|Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6
|Youth Coaching Breakdown Officiating
|Coaches Players Others Supporters and fans
Click on CC button at top left of video for other translation options.
Chris Green England
Really helpful video. Breakdown is always a tough one to ref and coach but this gives a lot of clarity. More ref videos please!
Ronnie Mata Taurarii USA
Cheers Chris, love the breakdown of each scenario for both ruck and maul from both player/ coach and referee perspectives.
Jonts McKerrow New Zealand
Fantastic tutorial. That’s the best demonstration and explanation of the ruck laws that I’ve witnessed. Great work Chris.
Joe Duffy Ireland
Excellent videos – will there be one on the work of the ball carrier on the ground and their 1 dynamic movement?
Phil Guest England
Great. More ref videos please
Fred Moe Arabian Gulf
I have a question. Where is the offside line ? Is it at the last man’s foot?
Roger C. Wilson USA
Terrific. Extremely helpful.
Roger Thomson Canada
Great to have the referees point of view. I believe that Matthew Carter is correct about the time given to the 9 at the back of rucks when the ball is clearly out. It may be an unwritten rule now that high level players do not go after these balls as a trade off for the referee allowing them so often to stand in an offside position (not behind the closest body part to their own goal) beside a ruck with out joining. Many are allowed to stand mid ruck either defensively or offensively with just a hand in contact. This, in my opinion, is what kills the flow of the game as the next tackler is coming from an offside position. Part of coaching young players is helping them to identify when the ball is out of the ruck and now time to attack. I usually fall back to “If a bird can poop on it, it’s out!” More content from experienced referees is welcome. Thank you Chris.
Des Amanono England
Brilliant. So many subtle aspects to the contact area law. Just picked up two new ones!
Sebastian Suarez Argentina
Subtitular al castellano, please
Matthew Carter England
The new laws will be interesting – Going to a session tonight to get full clarity!!!
The old Ruck law was never refereed properly for it stated that a Ruck was one player from either side in physical contact OVER the ball. Quite clearly in one of the examples highlighted the ball was right at the back clearly not between two players in physical contact OVER the ball so should have been fair game for the defending team to go around the ruck and pinch & potentially spoil the ball
Far too much protection is given to Scrum Half’s to play the ball at their leisure especially when lining up a box kick manoeuvring the ball often with their feet hands etc. Taking an absolute age to get their box kick in. Referees have allowed this in my opinion for it gives them an easier time of things when actually the ball is not in a ruck at all
For me that ball is again fair play for players on the defensive team to go and steal
This licence given to Scrum Half’s more than anything is slowing the game down
andres Monteverde Argentina
really great to have some laws stuff but I really got confused now. Last situation doesn’t seem a ruck to me, cause defending player never was on his feet. Could you please explain?
Buzz Molloy Ireland
Law 16.1(b) clearly states that players must be on their feet for a ruck to be formed. Scenario 2 as outlined cannot be a ruck. Can you please clarify?
Len Ethell New Zealand
In the ideal Rugby World this would be fine but when the Laws are not applied we see Players coming in from the side , all day long, as was the case in the recent AB’s v Lions series.
Peter Telford England
Yes. Perfect age group U15s as well.
Troy Condon Australia
More of these please. Great insight.
Hamish Webb England
This is the best TRS series yet. Anyone who has coached an age group team knows that a good Ref will be a huge help to the development of players at the breakdown. The opposite of course is the same and good work through the week can be spoilt by challenging Ref decisions in the game. Too many side line experts have never Refereed a game( or played) and only see rugby on the box with assistant Refs and 13 cameras to help. Most age group refs are pleased if they get 2 Touch Judges
Aaron Callaghan New Zealand
Great idea. Really looking forward to this series.
John Walker England
As a former player, referee and coach, albeit at a lower club level I understand where Chris is coming from. Club spectators and many players love to do down refs yet nearly all have never reffed or read a law book. Rugby site should build on this expertise aimed at club level players and hopefully a more informed understanding of a refs role will develop.
Get full access to all videos in this course and the rest of the video library. Learn with in-depth courses from the best rugby minds in the world, including:
- Graham Henry & Warren Gatland
- Wayne Smith & Eddie Jones
- Sam Warburton & Richie McCaw
- Leigh Halfpenny & Victor Matfield
Get instant access
Trial period available!