Mallett's international experience merits England job over rookie Lancaster

Small

JG

Our undercover man inside the game

about 1 year ago

Good luck to Ian Richie as he takes the helm at the RFU this week. One of his first tasks will be to oversee the selection of England Head Coach. It would appear to be a two horse race between Stuart Lancaster and Nick Mallett as a number of other candidates have ruled themselves out.

Lancaster has restored order to the unruly mob who holidayed in New Zealand in September & October. He has restored old style values such as respect, commitment and hard graft and has expunged some less desirable influences from the elite player group. John Major would have described the campaign as “back to basics". It is as much about reconnecting with the disillusioned English rugby public as it is getting results, though the two are inextricably linked. It was also about rescuing potentially at risk commercial sponsorships.

Hard fought wins against Italy and Scotland were celebrated not necessarily for the quality of their execution but on the basis that “a win’s a win”. There were positives taken from the game against Wales at Twickenham though the loss was ultimately gut-wrenching for English players and supporters alike.

A recently signed four year sponsorship deal with mobile phone operator O2, estimated to be worth £25-30m, suggests that the new regime is offering succour to commercial partners.

For all Lancaster’s good qualities and impressive clarity of thought he does not yet have the experience required for the position. The early wins over Scotland and Italy were against teams ranked 11th and 12th in the world.

Mallett was South Africa head coach from 1997-2000 during which time the Springboks recorded a seventeen game winning streak. His four year tenure as head coach saw Stade Francais win the French club championship in 2003 & 2004. The most notable achievement by Italy under Mallet was the defeat of France in the 2011 6 Nations.

He also achieved as a player representing Oxford in the 1980 Varsity match, winning 4 Currie Cups with Western Province and representing the Springboks on two occasions.

Mallett is a strong personality and experienced with the off pitch responsibilities that come with the job of head coach. He is widely known and respected amongst the global rugby community.

Critics of Mallett will note that Italy slipped from 11th to 12th in the IRB rankings during his time as head coach. While this is indisputable, few would argue that Italy have become greatly more competitive opposition during this time.

Some will demand that the RFU should not appoint a foreigner as head coach. The pedants will note that Mallett was in fact born in Hertfordshire, though moved with his family to Rhodesia at 6 weeks old! This should not influence the decision as England needs the best man for the job.

The RFU claim that rugby union is the fastest growing sport in England, so as hosts of RWC 2015 and with Rugby Sevens an Olympic sport from 2016, a lot is at stake. England are now 6th in the IRB world rankings and will have to be in the top four by the end of this year if they are to be a seeded team for RWC 2015.

Stuart Lancaster has started the rebuilding of England and has proved highly effective thus far but has a mere three test matches under his belt. If England is to launch a serious challenge for world cup glory in 2015 then time is of the essence. The RFU don’t have the luxury of allowing a coach to learn his trade at this level. Mallett is experienced, proven and available and is the man best equipped to lead England back to the Promised Land.

Posted under News & Opinions

5

Comments

gb
Missing-small

Report as inappropriate

william bishop

about 1 year ago

I think your view of Mallett is skewed. “Critics of Mallett will note that Italy slipped from 11th to 12th in the IRB rankings during his time as head coach. While this is indisputable, few would argue that Italy have become greatly more competitive opposition during this time.”

Really? Competitiveness is relative to how far and fast your opponents are moving, and Italy were plainly not keeping up with the Joneses. The emotive win against France disguised the fact that under Mallett, the Azzurri managed a paltry 21% win record. His predecessor Pierre Berbizier rolled in at 40%. Having worked in rugby during that period I can assure you that Italy were far more of a threat to win games than they have been for the past two seasons. Can you imagine any Italian team under Mallett winning 37-17 in Edinburgh, as Berbizier’s did? No.

Mallett’s significant international success was more than 12 years ago with the Springboks. That hiatus and his lack of success in developing Italy means that he is not the proven quantity you indicate.

SL meanwhile has instilled a new faith in both the playing squad and England rugby supporters, and I don’t believe that Mallett could either replicate that or simply ‘carry it on’ – as if it can be handed on as some kind of badge.

It is true he has much to learn as an international coach, but he is learning fast. That process should not on any account be interrupted by the appointment of a ‘name’ who has been doing the international rounds for a number of years now.

gb
Missing-small

Report as inappropriate

Geoff Morgan

about 1 year ago

Granted England’s first two games in this years 6 nations were nothing to shout about but they were win’s, the Wales game was a completely different matter, they upped their game considerably. The only flaw that SL really made was in his choice of replacements namely Youngs, he does not deserve to be in the squad at all, another dodgy one was Matt Stevens as he immediately gave away stupid penalties which so far in the main had been avoided.

So in my book i think RFU should confirm Stuart Lancaster as Head Coach and give him all the support he requires to get England back to the top, not just of the northern hemisphere but over the southern tikes as well.

za
Small

Report as inappropriate

S Spooony

about 1 year ago

England do not need a coach but a miracle worker.

gb
Missing-small

Report as inappropriate

Manuka Wood

about 1 year ago

First the job has to be made appealing. Clean house. Then we pick from the best. If the best are not putting their hands up, dont recruit. Till then, no fixed dates, stick with Lancaster. Andrew: I guess it’s not his job to make England coaching appealing? How many good coaches will put their hand up to work for a Teflon boss? M.J. should be coach still. MJ would have made same selection changes as they were obvious and would have beaten Wales. MJ would have continued to improve on 10 out of 13 last year. Gutting. Andrew… You know what your country asks of you. Not saying MJ should have the job, but we know it’s fixed when he puts his hand up. With Edwards, Malinder, Robinson, Woodward, Smith, all of them saying I would if I had a chance. Strength in depth.
gb
Missing-small

Report as inappropriate

Manuka Wood

about 1 year ago

Good to see Ritchies statement. But don’t “select” Lancaster. Simply extend the interim with no end date… Yet.